https://single-men.startentree.nl/
https://single-men.brabantmotorverhuur.nl/
https://single-men.vakantiestartpagina.net/
https://single-men.hetmooistedorp.be/
https://single-men.jobcenters.nl/
https://single-men.sexybegin.be/
https://single-men.hoeverandertmijnzorg.nl/
https://single-men.linkstartup.nl/
This can even be true of hardcore players pushing ONS arrangements—they can readily believe that women are made better off by participating. These are the players who tend to love Women, but not *a* woman. They try to charm everyone, from 13-year-old girls to grandmothers.
If, on the other hand, you view persuasion as something you do TO someone, as a kind of hit-and-run crime or raid or mugging, then you will be forced to either dehumanize the victim OR to retain the victim’s humanity and just live with a moral structure that can justify it or rationalize said behavior, perhaps as part of a realpolitik argument.
These are the players who tend to dislike Women, but they may like *a* woman. They waste little effort on trying to be generally charming; they turn it on for pursuing specific targets.
Confusing, eh? It may intuitively sound like a woman would be better off with an LTR with the Women-lover, but he’s an extremely high flight risk. The misogynist can actually be safer, provided he puts his LTR mate in a special, somewhat pedestalized category and other women are generally treated with something approaching contempt. It’s just one of these weird paradox factors in male sexuality and its expression.
I think that for internal consistency it’s generally more important for religious guys to take the “…for someone” to heart and really believe it.
156
Liz says:
December 10, 2014 at 4:24 pm
#155: Wow, that was amazingly well put, and thought provoking Bastiat.
157
Liz says:
December 10, 2014 at 4:28 pm
https://single-men.brabantmotorverhuur.nl/
https://single-men.vakantiestartpagina.net/
https://single-men.hetmooistedorp.be/
https://single-men.jobcenters.nl/
https://single-men.sexybegin.be/
https://single-men.hoeverandertmijnzorg.nl/
https://single-men.linkstartup.nl/
This can even be true of hardcore players pushing ONS arrangements—they can readily believe that women are made better off by participating. These are the players who tend to love Women, but not *a* woman. They try to charm everyone, from 13-year-old girls to grandmothers.
If, on the other hand, you view persuasion as something you do TO someone, as a kind of hit-and-run crime or raid or mugging, then you will be forced to either dehumanize the victim OR to retain the victim’s humanity and just live with a moral structure that can justify it or rationalize said behavior, perhaps as part of a realpolitik argument.
These are the players who tend to dislike Women, but they may like *a* woman. They waste little effort on trying to be generally charming; they turn it on for pursuing specific targets.
Confusing, eh? It may intuitively sound like a woman would be better off with an LTR with the Women-lover, but he’s an extremely high flight risk. The misogynist can actually be safer, provided he puts his LTR mate in a special, somewhat pedestalized category and other women are generally treated with something approaching contempt. It’s just one of these weird paradox factors in male sexuality and its expression.
I think that for internal consistency it’s generally more important for religious guys to take the “…for someone” to heart and really believe it.
156
Liz says:
December 10, 2014 at 4:24 pm
#155: Wow, that was amazingly well put, and thought provoking Bastiat.
157
Liz says:
December 10, 2014 at 4:28 pm